The relevance of technology has grown throughout the ages
and is now an inseparable part of society. As it evolves, so does surrounding
culture and communication. What once started as an entrepreneurial idea has
become the base of the lifestyles of many people. The public now has access to
almost any information in a matter of seconds, can achieve an online diploma, and can communicate with each other through many methods such as pictures, social
media, and texts. One can even live off the connections technology makes to the
community. Advancements in technology create a world where about anything can
be made easier, perhaps too easy. The uprising of a new era holds great developments
for the future, but leaves behind in pile of rubble many values our evolving
society may never again experience.
Early technology thrust the world into a state rapid change
to satisfy the urge to make a more efficient and better connected society. Before
the 19th century technology had little to no impact on the world’s
communication. In fact, mass communication wasn’t even existent until Johannes
Gutenberg invented the printing press. “The rotary press was just on tiny part
of the great technological explosion known as the Industrial Revolution, which
would irreversibly change Western culture and lifestyles” (Culture and Communication Part 1 25). This brought with it the
first form of mass communication. Information could be sent out to numerous
people. These messages were interpreted by civilians who could then respond the
message by starting trends, contemplating a topic, or taking action to support
or deny what they had read. People could now become part of a mass culture,
however, some might call mass culture “conformity”. Mass culture would help to
eventually break down the barriers between upper class and lower class citizens
as a sense of community began to form. With a sense of community, empathy
becomes more relevant as seen on Joe’s journey around the U.S.A. “It was truly
inspiring, you know, just on humanity…to know that we can take care of each
other” (Craigslist Joe). The
evolution of technology had brought a new sense of community with it. Jeremy Rifkin
argues that in order for the human race to come together as an extended family,
we must learn to communicate better with each other in which technology can
come in handy. “There was no such thing as Germany. There was no such thing as
France. These are fictions. But they allow us to extend our family so that we
can have loyalties and identities based on the new complex energy communication
revolutions we have that annihilate time and space” (Rifkin The Empathic Civilization). Rifkin may
be correct in this case. Identities like religions, sports teams, or
nationality may help us become closer as a human race. As technology advances and becomes
a part of popular culture, our society finds it easier to communicate, yet,
ironically loses its sense of community which creates a pretentious culture.
Technology
has many obvious effects on communication and lifestyle in modern society. At first
glance, most of these effects seem beneficial to society, however, some
technological advances have hindered the fluidity of our cultures connectedness.
New technology such as online socializing, banking, education, interviews, and
conferences are just a few ways technology makes life easier and perhaps saves
time. The fact that we rely on such technologies makes us a self-centered,
introspective, and perhaps less empathetic culture. Roman Krznaric explains the
key to a revolutionary and successful society. “…empathy is the way to
revolutionize our own philosophies of lives, to become more outrospective, and
to create the revolution of human relationships that I think we so desperately
need” (Krznaric The Power of
Outrospection). Technology is a form of communication without human
elements. Therefore, human confrontation in “real life” is almost alien to a judgmental
culture. Users of technology don’t truly experience people's stories and gain
perspective on others’ lives which creates a barrier between subcultures and
cultures. Connections become severed from these limited forms of communication.
Communication isn’t just limited by technology, but it is also limited by mass
media. Mass media, some suggest, has too much power when the opinion of the
people is at hand. “In mass communication, professional communicators use
technological devices known as mass media to communicate over great distances
to influence large audiences” (Culture
and Communication Part 1 7). Mass communicators carry out a single message
that is usually biased towards their opinion so the audience is more likely to
be influenced by them. This is corruptive in a way because people that don’t
see past this ruse fall into the lure of having an opinion they didn’t create.
Mass media becomes part of our life by discussing popular culture, advertising,
and discussing national and international problems. Our culture is so familiar
with the mass media around them that they can easily filter out all the
advertising put up. “For many years America has been exporting its popular
culture, first as images in motion pictures, magazines, music, and television
and finally commercial enterprises” (Culture
and Communication Part 2 36). Our society has adapted to mass communication
and can simply thrive off of it without realizing it. Technology and mass media
have contorted the trustfulness and communication efficiency of modern society.
The new age of communication effects modern and future society which will always
function differently because of its impact. Left behind are many human values
which civilization may never see again. Some think they truly help the community
through buying into consumer items that support charities and that creates a
false sense of community and satisfaction because you know you helped someone.
Even though it does help, there is much more that could be done. Slajov Zizek
compares this to buying organic apples to prove his point. “I don’t think you
believe…that they are really any better…We are cynics they’re sceptics but you
know, it makes you feel warm…I’m doing something” (Zizec First as Tragedy, Then as Farce). Our society is slowly losing its
sense of community as ethical duties seemingly become easier to “satisfy”.
People who suffer who we think we are helping aren’t actually being helped
permanently. Their suffering is only prolonged. The only feasible way to
correct this problem would be to create a society where poverty is impossible.
Many other changes should be made in modern society to further benefit future
generations and quicken societal evolution. Sir Ken Robinson gives an example
of an element of society that should be changed. “Schools are still pretty much
organized on factory lines” (Robinson Changing
Paradigms). Education pumps out kids in batches, treating them like a
product. They are all taught the same methods instead of focusing on what each
individual child needs to blossom intellectually time-wise and learning-wise.
If this isn’t changed, future generations may lose the individuality and boldness
to thrust into the next revolutions. In fact, much more is at stake. Even the
uniqueness and power of individuals (such as artists) are slowly fading.
Technology has made sharing personal information, art, or work extremely easy. Keen
argues against the ease of sharing of art through the internet. "Slap up their early stuff on
Facebook. On YouTube. It would get lost. It would get lost in the ocean of
garbage" (Keen PressPausePlay).
So many people can share their information and art that it becomes lost. There
is so much other information on the internet that the chances of your message
being heard by the community is very slim. Many more components of traditional
society fade as technology and communication methods evolve.
The
path to a better community lies through keeping traditional values while
letting technology advance. Technology will create a better connected society
but empathy must be kept intact through human elements such as sense of
community. Society must find a way to use technology and maintain outrospective
properties without becoming self-centered. The human bond will be strengthened if
all these goals are achieved. A utopic society will never be achieved if the
natural human characteristics cannot be maintained as a result of communicative
suppression, but future generations will thrive if our culture learns how to
better connect itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment